Ultimate Compliance Comparison
APRA CPS 234 versus Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
Explore the differences between APRA CPS 234 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR).
Never use spreadsheets again for compliance mapping
Explore and contrast APRA CPS 234 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
APRA CPS 234 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) are two frameworks for managing cyber security risk in Australia. APRA CPS 234 is a prescriptive set of requirements issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) that all regulated entities must comply with. RFFR is a more flexible framework developed by the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC) that provides guidance on how to identify and manage cyber security risks. Both frameworks share the same goal of helping organisations protect their information assets, but APRA CPS 234 is more focused on compliance while RFFR is more focused on risk management. RFFR also provides more detailed guidance on how to implement risk management processes, while APRA CPS 234 provides more guidance on what is expected of regulated entities.
What is APRA CPS 234?
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) CPS 234 is a set of guidelines that outlines the requirements for cloud service providers (CSPs) that offer cloud services to APRA-regulated entities. The purpose of the CPS 234 is to ensure that CSPs are providing secure and reliable cloud services that meet the security and data protection requirements of APRA-regulated entities. The CPS 234 covers topics such as security controls, incident management, data protection, privacy, and operational resilience. The CPS 234 also provides guidance on how to assess the security of cloud services and how to ensure that the cloud services are compliant with APRA regulations.
What is Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)?
Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a comprehensive risk management program designed to provide organizations with the tools and resources to effectively manage their risk exposure. The program is designed to help organizations identify, assess, and manage their risk in order to reduce their overall risk exposure. RFFR provides a comprehensive framework that includes a risk assessment process, risk management plans, and risk monitoring and reporting tools. The program also provides resources to help organizations develop and implement effective risk management strategies. RFFR is designed to be flexible and customizable to meet the unique needs of each organization. The program is designed to help organizations identify their risk and develop strategies to mitigate or manage their risk exposure. RFFR provides a comprehensive approach to risk management that enables organizations to be proactive in their risk management efforts.
A Comparison Between APRA CPS 234 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
1. Both frameworks focus on the implementation of effective risk management processes.
2. Both frameworks provide guidance on the establishment of risk management frameworks, risk appetite, risk identification, risk assessment, risk treatment and monitoring.
3. Both frameworks are designed to ensure organizations have effective controls in place to protect their assets and reduce their exposure to risk.
4. Both frameworks are designed to be flexible and adaptable to the specific needs of the organization.
5. Both frameworks emphasize the importance of communication and collaboration between stakeholders in the risk management process.
6. Both frameworks require organizations to develop and maintain a risk management culture.
7. Both frameworks require organizations to regularly review their risk management processes and controls.
The Key Differences Between APRA CPS 234 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
1. APRA CPS 234 is a mandatory regulation for all APRA-regulated entities, while Right Fit for Risk (RFFR) is a voluntary framework.
2. APRA CPS 234 focuses on the security of information systems and data, while RFFR focuses on the security of the entire organisation.
3. APRA CPS 234 is focused on the technical aspects of cybersecurity, while RFFR is focused on the overall risk management strategy.
4. APRA CPS 234 requires organisations to adhere to specific standards and controls, while RFFR provides guidance on how to manage risk and security in a holistic manner.
5. APRA CPS 234 is focused on the protection of customer data, while RFFR focuses on the security of the organisationâs assets and operations.
Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning
Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.
'Push-down' standards to teams
'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.
'Roll up' analytics for reporting
Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams.
Our customers have spoken.
They genuinely love 6clicks.
"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."
David Simpson | CyberCX
"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”
Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed
"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."
Head of Compliance | Fortune 500
"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."
GRC 20/20 Research LLC