Skip to content

Ultimate Compliance Comparison

NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) versus Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)

Explore the differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR). 


Never use spreadsheets again for compliance mapping

Explore and contrast NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) are two frameworks designed to help organizations manage their cyber risk. While both frameworks offer similar security capabilities, they differ in their approach. The NIST CSF is a top-down approach that focuses on a comprehensive assessment of an organization's cyber risk and provides a structured way to prioritize and address those risks. In contrast, RFFR is a bottom-up approach that focuses on a more tailored approach to cyber risk management, allowing organizations to identify and address specific risks that fit their needs. Both frameworks provide organizations with the necessary tools to manage their cyber risks, but the approach taken by each framework may be better suited for different organizations.

What is NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)?

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a voluntary risk-based framework developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to help organizations manage cybersecurity-related risk. The framework is composed of five core functions—Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover—as well as a set of underlying categories and subcategories. The framework is designed to be flexible and customizable, allowing organizations to tailor the framework to their specific needs and risk profiles. The CSF is intended to be used in conjunction with existing security and risk management practices, such as those outlined in NIST Special Publication 800-53. The framework provides organizations with a common language for discussing cybersecurity risk and provides a roadmap for managing and mitigating risk.

What is Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)?

Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a risk management consulting firm that helps businesses identify, assess, and manage their risks. RFFR specializes in providing risk management solutions tailored to the needs of each client. Their services include risk assessment, risk analysis, risk mitigation, and risk management. They also provide training and support to ensure that their clients have the tools and knowledge necessary to effectively manage their risks. RFFR works with businesses of all sizes, from small businesses to large corporations, and can help them identify, assess, and manage the risks associated with their operations. RFFR provides a comprehensive suite of services that are tailored to the specific needs of each client. By working with RFFR, businesses can ensure that their risks are managed in the most effective and efficient manner possible.

A Comparison Between NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)

1. Both frameworks are risk-based approaches to cybersecurity.

2. Both frameworks are designed to enable organizations to identify and prioritize their cybersecurity needs.

3. Both frameworks provide guidance on how to develop, implement and manage cybersecurity programs.

4. Both frameworks provide a holistic view of cybersecurity, including people, processes and technology.

5. Both frameworks provide a common language and structure for organizations to use when discussing cybersecurity.

6. Both frameworks emphasize the importance of communication and collaboration among stakeholders.

7. Both frameworks emphasize the need for organizations to assess their risk posture and develop appropriate mitigation strategies.

8. Both frameworks provide guidance on how to measure the effectiveness of cybersecurity programs.

The Key Differences Between NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)

1. NIST CSF focuses on prevention and mitigation while RFFR focuses on risk management.

2. NIST CSF is a set of guidelines and standards while RFFR is a risk assessment methodology.

3. NIST CSF is a top-down approach while RFFR is a bottom-up approach.

4. NIST CSF is a voluntary framework while RFFR is a mandatory framework.

5. NIST CSF is focused on risk management while RFFR is focused on compliance.

6. NIST CSF has five core functions while RFFR has four.

Trusted by 1,000's of business worldwide

GKN automotive industry 6clicks
Volaris private equity using 6clicks
NSW government using 6clicks
Canva using 6clicks
NTT telecommunications using 6clicks
Flybuys using 6clicks for risk and compliance
CyberCX using 6clicks cybersecurity MSP
TCS advisor using 6clicks for GRC
Clydo & Co using 6clicks for legal services
G+T using 6clicks for risk and compliance
BDO using 6clicks for risk and compliance

6clicks lets you compare hundreds of standards, regulations and frameworks in seconds — no code required.


Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning

Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.
HubSpot Video


Hub & Spoke

'Push-down' standards to teams

'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.


'Roll up' analytics for reporting

Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams. 

Our customers have spoken.

They genuinely love 6clicks.

"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."

David Simpson | CyberCX

"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”

Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed 

"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."

Head of Compliance | Fortune 500

Top 100 Innovators
Capterra review badge
RegTech Top 100
CRN Top 100
Michael Rasmussen | GRC 20/20 Research LLC

"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."

Michael Rasmussen
GRC 20/20 Research LLC

6clicks is powered by AI and includes all the content you need.
Our unique 6clicks Hub & Spoke architecture makes it simple to use and deploy.