Ultimate Compliance Comparison
ASD IRAP versus NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)
Explore the differences between ASD IRAP and NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF).
Never use spreadsheets again for compliance mapping
Explore and contrast ASD IRAP and NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)
ASD IRAP and NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) are two different approaches to cybersecurity. ASD IRAP focuses on the security of government systems and is more prescriptive in its approach. It requires organizations to meet a set of requirements and then undergo an independent assessment to ensure they are compliant. NIST CSF is a more flexible approach that provides organizations with a framework for managing their cybersecurity risk. It is based on a set of core principles and involves organizations creating their own risk-based strategies to identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover from cyber threats.
What is ASD IRAP?
ASD IRAP (The Australian Signals Directorate Information Security Registered Assessors Program) is a program developed by the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) to help organizations assess and improve their cyber security posture. The program provides organizations with a framework to assess their security posture, identify areas of improvement, and implement necessary security controls. The program is based on the ASD Information Security Manual (ISM), which provides guidance on the security controls organizations should implement to protect their systems and data. The program also provides organizations with access to a team of certified assessors who can provide advice and guidance on implementing the security controls outlined in the ISM. The program is designed to help organizations protect their systems and data from malicious actors, reduce the risk of data breaches, and ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.
What is NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)?
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a voluntary framework developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to help organizations improve their cybersecurity posture. It provides a set of guidelines and best practices to help organizations identify, assess, and manage their cybersecurity risks. The framework is divided into five core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. Within each of these functions, organizations can use the framework to develop a comprehensive cybersecurity program that is tailored to their specific risk profile. The framework also provides guidance on how to measure and report on an organizations cybersecurity posture. The NIST CSF is widely used by organizations of all sizes and is an important tool for helping organizations protect their data and systems from cyber threats.
A Comparison Between ASD IRAP and NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)
1. Both ASD IRAP and NIST CSF focus on the protection of information systems and the associated data.
2. Both frameworks provide a comprehensive set of security controls to reduce cyber risks.
3. Both frameworks emphasize the need for organizations to assess their security posture and identify areas of improvement.
4. Both frameworks emphasize the need for organizations to develop a comprehensive security strategy and plan.
5. Both frameworks emphasize the need for organizations to implement security controls, monitor their systems and respond quickly to threats.
6. Both frameworks emphasize the need for organizations to have a well-defined incident response plan.
7. Both frameworks emphasize the importance of regular security testing and assessments.
8. Both frameworks emphasize the need for organizations to maintain a culture of security awareness and vigilance.
The Key Differences Between ASD IRAP and NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)
1. ASD IRAP focuses on Australia-specific security controls, while NIST CSF is a global framework.
2. ASD IRAP is based on a risk management approach, while NIST CSF is based on a risk-based approach.
3. ASD IRAP is a government-mandated security standard, while NIST CSF is voluntary.
4. ASD IRAP is focused on the security of government networks and systems, while NIST CSF is focused on the security of private sector organizations.
5. ASD IRAP is more prescriptive in its approach, while NIST CSF is more flexible and customizable.
Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning
Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.
'Push-down' standards to teams
'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.
'Roll up' analytics for reporting
Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams.
Our customers have spoken.
They genuinely love 6clicks.
"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."
David Simpson | CyberCX
"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”
Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed
"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."
Head of Compliance | Fortune 500
"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."
GRC 20/20 Research LLC