Skip to content

Ultimate Compliance Comparison

Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) versus ASD IRAP


Explore the differences between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and ASD IRAP. 

 

Never use spreadsheets again for compliance mapping


Explore and contrast Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and ASD IRAP

Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and ASD IRAP are two frameworks used to assess the security of organizations. RFFR is a risk-based approach that focuses on the organization's risk profile and its ability to manage and mitigate risks. ASD IRAP is a control-based approach that focuses on the security controls in place, their effectiveness, and the organization's ability to monitor and maintain them. Both frameworks provide a comprehensive assessment of the organization's security posture, but RFFR is better suited to organizations that need to prioritize and manage risks, while ASD IRAP is better suited to organizations that need to ensure the security of their systems and data.



What is Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)?

Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a risk management software solution that helps organizations assess and manage risk in a more efficient and cost-effective manner. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools to help organizations identify, measure, and manage risk in order to maximize performance and minimize losses. It offers an easy-to-use interface that allows users to quickly and accurately assess risk and make informed decisions. RFFR helps organizations identify and prioritize risk, develop and implement risk mitigation strategies, and track and monitor risk over time. It also provides detailed reports and analytics to help organizations better understand their risk profile and make more informed decisions. With its comprehensive capabilities, RFFR is an ideal solution for organizations of all sizes.



What is ASD IRAP?

ASD IRAP (Information Risk Assessment Process) is a framework developed by the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) to help organizations identify, assess, and manage their information security risks. The framework is designed to be flexible enough to accommodate different organizations and their specific security needs. ASD IRAP focuses on the identification and management of risks associated with the storage, transmission, and use of information. It provides guidance on how to develop an effective risk management program and how to implement a risk-based approach to security. It also outlines the responsibilities of the organization in managing the risks associated with its information. The framework is based on the principles of risk management, which include identifying, assessing, controlling, and monitoring risks. ASD IRAP provides a comprehensive approach to managing information security risks, which includes the development of policies and procedures, the implementation of risk assessment and control measures, and the monitoring of security performance.



A Comparison Between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and ASD IRAP

1. Both RFFR and ASD IRAP are risk management frameworks that are used to assess and manage risk in organizations.

2. Both frameworks provide a set of processes and tools to identify, assess, and mitigate risks.

3. Both frameworks emphasize the importance of understanding the organization’s risk profile and risk appetite.

4. Both frameworks emphasize the importance of effective communication and collaboration between different stakeholders in order to manage risk in an organization.

5. Both frameworks provide guidance on how to develop and implement a risk management strategy.



The Key Differences Between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and ASD IRAP

1. Right Fit for Risk (RFFR) is a risk-based approach to security, while ASD IRAP is a compliance-based approach.

2. RFFR focuses on the organizations risk appetite, while ASD IRAP focuses on meeting specific security requirements.

3. RFFR is more flexible and adaptive to changing threats, while ASD IRAP is a static approach.

4. RFFR is designed to be more cost-effective, while ASD IRAP can be more expensive.

5. RFFR is designed to be more agile and responsive, while ASD IRAP is designed to be more thorough and methodical.



Trusted by 1,000's of business worldwide

KWM
GKN automotive industry 6clicks
Volaris private equity using 6clicks
NSW government using 6clicks
Canva using 6clicks
NTT telecommunications using 6clicks
Flybuys using 6clicks for risk and compliance
CyberCX using 6clicks cybersecurity MSP
TCS advisor using 6clicks for GRC
Clydo & Co using 6clicks for legal services
G+T using 6clicks for risk and compliance
BDO using 6clicks for risk and compliance

6clicks lets you compare hundreds of standards, regulations and frameworks in seconds — no code required.

GET STARTED NOW

Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning


Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.
HubSpot Video

 

Hub & Spoke

'Push-down' standards to teams

'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.

Analytics

'Roll up' analytics for reporting

Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams. 

Our customers have spoken.

They genuinely love 6clicks.

"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."


David Simpson | CyberCX

"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”

Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed 

"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."

Head of Compliance | Fortune 500

Top 100 Innovators
customers-love-us-white
Capterra review badge
G2-Winter-Leader-ALL
RegTech Top 100
CRN Top 100
Michael Rasmussen | GRC 20/20 Research LLC

"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."

Michael Rasmussen
GRC 20/20 Research LLC

6clicks is powered by AI and includes all the content you need.
Our unique 6clicks Hub & Spoke architecture makes it simple to use and deploy.

logo
logo
logo
logo
logo
logo

GET STARTED TODAY