Skip to content

What are the five stages of threat modeling?

Explore some of our latest AI related thought leadership and research

6clicks has been built for cyber risk and compliance professionals to automate and streamline security compliance, IT risk management, vendor risk management, incident management, and more.

Learn more about our Hub & Spoke architecture, Hailey AI engine and explore the other content in our platform here

Risk, threat and vulnerability - what's the difference?

Risk, threat and vulnerability - what's the difference?

What is the difference between NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF?

What is the difference between NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF?

The top 5 vendor risk assessment questionnaires for 2023

The top 5 vendor risk assessment questionnaires for 2023

What is a risk register and how to automate

What is a risk register and why is it important?

Top management's key responsibilities for ISO 27001 implementation

Top management's key responsibilities for ISO 27001 implementation

The founder’s story: How 6clicks was born and what’s behind the name

The founder’s story: How 6clicks was born and what’s behind the name


What is threat modeling?

Threat modeling is a proactive approach to identifying potential threats and vulnerabilities in a system or application. It is a systematic process that helps security teams and development teams understand the potential attackers and their motivations, identify potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors, and analyze the potential impact of successful attacks on the system. By doing so, threat modeling allows organizations to prioritize their security efforts by focusing on the most critical and relevant threats. It provides a visual representation of the system's security posture, allowing stakeholders to make informed decisions about security measures and allocate resources effectively. Threat modeling can be performed at various stages of the software development life cycle and can be tailored to meet the unique needs of different organizations and applications.

Benefits of threat modeling

Threat modeling is a crucial component of any robust security strategy, offering numerous benefits to organizations. By identifying and fixing vulnerabilities during the design phase, threat modeling significantly reduces costs and improves efficiency.

One major advantage of threat modeling is the reduction in vulnerabilities discovered during bug bounty programs. These programs rely on independent security researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities in an organization's systems. However, with effective threat modeling, many of these vulnerabilities can be preemptively addressed, resulting in fewer issues being discovered during these programs.

Additionally, threat modeling helps decrease security incidents by proactively identifying potential attack vectors and implementing appropriate security measures. By analyzing potential threats and their impact, organizations can strengthen their security posture and better protect their valuable assets.

Not only does threat modeling assist in mitigating risks, but it also provides a visual representation through various diagrams and models. This facilitates a detailed analysis of potential security threats, making it easier for security teams and development teams to prioritize and address them effectively.

Five stages of threat modeling

Threat modeling is a systematic process that helps organizations identify and mitigate potential security threats. It consists of five stages that guide the approach to threat modeling: identifying assets, determining threats, analyzing risks, creating mitigation strategies, and implementing security controls.

The first stage involves identifying assets, which are the resources or components of an organization that need protection. This includes systems, data, infrastructure, and intellectual property. By understanding what needs protection, organizations can prioritize their efforts and allocate resources effectively.

The second stage focuses on determining threats. This involves identifying potential attackers, their motives, and the methods they might use to exploit vulnerabilities. By considering different threat scenarios, organizations can proactively anticipate and prevent attacks.

The third stage involves analyzing risks and vulnerabilities. This includes evaluating the potential impact and likelihood of threats occurring and identifying existing vulnerabilities in the system. This analysis helps prioritize potential risks and vulnerabilities based on their severity and likelihood of exploitation.

The fourth stage is about creating mitigation strategies. Once potential risks and vulnerabilities have been identified, organizations can develop strategies to mitigate or reduce their impact. This may involve implementing security controls, such as access controls, encryption, or monitoring systems.

The final stage is implementing security controls. Organizations must put in place the recommended security measures and controls identified during the previous stages. This may involve configuring firewalls, deploying intrusion detection systems, or conducting employee training on security best practices.

By following these five stages of threat modeling, organizations can effectively identify and address potential security threats, minimize vulnerabilities, and enhance their overall security posture.

Stage 1: identifying assets

In the first stage of threat modeling, organizations focus on identifying their key assets that require protection. This includes systems, data, infrastructure, and intellectual property. By understanding what needs to be safeguarded, organizations can prioritize their efforts and allocate resources effectively. This initial stage is crucial for establishing the foundation of a robust threat modeling process. Identifying assets enables organizations to subsequently determine the potential risks and vulnerabilities associated with these assets, enabling them to develop effective mitigation strategies. Through this thorough assessment of assets, organizations can proactively anticipate and prevent attacks, enhancing their overall security posture. This stage sets the stage for the subsequent stages of threat modeling, providing a clear understanding of the valuable resources that require protection.

Understanding assets and their values

In the context of threat modeling, it is crucial to understand the assets and their values. Assets refer to anything of value to an organization, such as data, infrastructure, applications, or intellectual property. Identifying these assets is an essential step in the threat modeling process.

When identifying assets, it is important to consider their values. The value of an asset is determined by its importance to the organization and the potential impact if it were compromised. For example, customer data may have a high value due to the potential harm that could result from a data breach.

Once assets are identified, they need to be prioritized based on their vulnerability to cyber attacks. This involves assessing the location and accessibility of the assets. Assets located in more vulnerable areas, such as public-facing systems or databases with weak security controls, are more susceptible to cyber attacks.

Prioritizing assets helps security teams focus their efforts on protecting the most critical and vulnerable assets first. By considering the values and vulnerabilities of assets, organizations can allocate resources appropriately to mitigate potential risks and strengthen their overall security posture.

Understanding assets and their values is a fundamental aspect of threat modeling. It enables organizations to gain a comprehensive understanding of their potential vulnerabilities and take proactive steps to safeguard against cyber attacks.

Defining the scope and trust boundaries

Defining the scope and trust boundaries is a crucial step in threat modeling as it helps identify the areas of a system that are most susceptible to potential threats. Trust boundaries act as virtual barriers that separate different components or processes within a system and dictate the level of interaction and trust between them.

By establishing trust boundaries, organizations can clearly define the scope of their system and identify the potential risks and vulnerabilities associated with each boundary. This allows security teams to focus their efforts on protecting the most critical areas that are most likely to be targeted by attackers.

For example, a login page can be considered a trust boundary within a system. It serves as a point of entry where users authenticate themselves before gaining access to certain resources or functionalities. The login page defines the access rights and privileges granted to individual users based on their credentials. By understanding the trust boundaries around the login page, organizations can ensure that the authentication process is secure and that unauthorized users are prevented from accessing sensitive information or performing malicious activities.

Identifying the actors involved

In the threat modeling process, it is crucial to identify the actors involved as they play a significant role in determining the potential threats and risks associated with a system. These actors include employees, contractors, business partners, legitimate users, and potential attackers.

Employees are individuals who work within the organization and have varying levels of access to the system and its assets. They may unintentionally pose risks through human error or negligence. Contractors, on the other hand, are external individuals or organizations that are hired to work on specific projects. They should be considered as potential actors with access to sensitive information or systems.

Business partners are entities that collaborate with the organization, and their interactions can introduce additional vulnerabilities or potential threats if their systems or practices are not adequately secured. Legitimate users are individuals who are authorized to access the system and its resources. They are typically granted specific privileges based on their roles and responsibilities. However, it is essential to consider the possibility of legitimate users abusing their privileges or unknowingly contributing to security risks.

Lastly, potential attackers are individuals or groups who have the intention and capability to exploit vulnerabilities in the system. These can be internal or external individuals, depending on the context. Understanding their motivations, capabilities, and potential attack vectors is critical for effective threat modeling.

Keywords: actors, employees, contractors, business partners, potential attackers.

Documenting the environment

Documenting the environment is a crucial step in threat modeling as it provides a comprehensive understanding of the system's components and their interactions. This documentation helps identify potential threats and vulnerabilities and enables effective risk mitigation strategies. To document the environment for threat modeling, the following steps should be followed:

  1. Identify system components: Begin by identifying all the system components, such as servers, databases, APIs, user interfaces, and external systems. This step ensures that all relevant components are considered during the threat modeling process.
  2. Determine interactions: Understand how these components interact with each other and with external entities. Identify communication channels, data flows, and dependencies between system components. This step helps identify potential attack vectors and vulnerabilities introduced through these interactions.
  3. Create visual representations: To gain a clear understanding of the environment, create visual representations such as data flow diagrams or process flow diagrams. Data flow diagrams depict the flow of data between system components, while process flow diagrams illustrate the steps and interactions involved in system processes. These visualizations help reveal potential threats and vulnerabilities, enabling security teams to focus their efforts on critical areas.
  4. Document system configurations: Document system configurations, including network layouts, firewall rules, access control lists, and authentication mechanisms. Understanding these configurations aids in identifying potential security gaps or misconfigurations that could be exploited by attackers.

By documenting the environment and creating visual representations, organizations can gain a holistic view of their system's components and interactions. This understanding allows for a more effective threat modeling process, enabling the identification and mitigation of potential threats and vulnerabilities.

Stage 2: determining threats

Once the system components and their interactions have been identified, the next stage in the threat modeling process is to determine the potential threats that could compromise the system's security. This stage involves a comprehensive analysis of the system and its environment to identify any potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors that attackers could exploit. Threat modelers consider a wide range of potential threats, including those posed by internal and external attackers, insider threats, social engineering attacks, denial of service attacks, and other common attacks. By analyzing the system from the perspective of various threat agents, such as hackers, malicious insiders, or competitors, security teams can gain a deeper understanding of the system's weak points and better prioritize their efforts to mitigate potential risks. This stage of the threat modeling process lays the foundation for the subsequent stages, helping to ensure that security requirements and measures adequately address the identified threats.

Gathering threat information sources

Gathering threat information sources is a crucial step in the threat modeling process. It involves identifying and collecting relevant information about potential threats to the application. To effectively gather these sources, it is important to understand the application's functionality, architecture, and design.

To begin, it is essential to have a clear understanding of the application's functionality. This includes identifying the various components and modules within the application and the interactions between them. By understanding how the application works, potential threats that could exploit its weaknesses can be identified.

Similarly, having a good grasp of the application's architecture and design is vital. This involves understanding the different layers of the application, such as the presentation layer, business logic layer, and data layer. By analyzing the architecture, potential vulnerabilities can be identified, and corresponding threats can be anticipated.

Threat analysis techniques, such as threat trees and use and misuse cases, can be utilized during this stage to aid in the identification and categorization of potential threats. Threat trees provide a visual representation of the threats and their relationships, while use and misuse cases help uncover potential threats through the analysis of how the application could be used or misused by various actors.

By effectively gathering threat information sources, security teams and development teams can have a comprehensive understanding of potential threats to the application. This information serves as the foundation for subsequent stages in the threat modeling process, including the analysis and mitigation of these threats.

Common attack vectors & techniques

Common attack vectors are the methods or techniques used by attackers to exploit vulnerabilities in a system. Threat modeling employs various methods to identify potential threats and mitigate risks. One such method is PASTA (Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis) which follows a step-by-step approach to identify and prioritize threats based on their impact and likelihood.

Another method is LINDDUN (Linking, Identification, Non-repudiation, Disclosure, Denial of Service, Unauthorized Access, and Elevation of Privilege) which helps in identifying vulnerabilities and threats through the analysis of different aspects of an application or system.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) is a framework used to assess the severity of vulnerabilities and assign scores based on their impact and exploitability.

Attack trees are another technique used in threat modeling which involve identifying the potential attack paths and scenarios that an attacker may use to exploit vulnerabilities and achieve their objectives.

By using these threat modeling methods and techniques, common attack vectors such as communication vulnerabilities, lifecycle vulnerabilities, software vulnerabilities, and physical vulnerabilities can be identified. Communication vulnerabilities can include insecure network protocols or weak encryption, while lifecycle vulnerabilities can arise from poor security practices during the development, deployment, or maintenance phases. Software vulnerabilities can be caused by coding errors or lack of secure coding practices. Physical vulnerabilities include weaknesses in physical security measures such as unauthorized access to hardware or sensitive information. By addressing and mitigating these vulnerabilities, the entry points for attackers can be minimized, and the overall security posture of the system can be improved.

Security requirements & objectives

Setting security requirements and objectives is a crucial step in the threat modeling process. In order to effectively protect valuable assets and mitigate potential risks, security teams need to clearly define their security goals and expectations.

High-level security objectives provide a broad framework for designing and implementing security measures. These objectives typically include the six security elements: confidentiality, integrity, availability, accountability, authenticity, and non-repudiation. Confidentiality ensures that sensitive information is protected from unauthorized access. Integrity ensures that data remains unaltered and trustworthy. Availability ensures that systems and resources are accessible and operational. Accountability ensures that actions can be traced back to individuals. Authenticity ensures that entities are verified and trusted. Non-repudiation ensures that actions can be proven by both parties involved.

Specific threats can significantly impact these objectives. For example, a potential attack vector like denial of service (DoS) can compromise availability by overwhelming system resources and rendering them unavailable to legitimate users. Counter-measures to address this threat may include implementing appropriate network firewalls, throttling mechanisms, or load balancing solutions to mitigate the risk of DoS attacks.

By understanding the potential threats and their impact on security objectives, security teams can proactively identify and implement appropriate counter-measures. This approach to threat modeling helps organizations align their security requirements with their high-level objectives, ultimately enhancing their overall security posture.

Creating a list of potential threats

Creating a list of potential threats is an essential step in the threat modeling process. It helps security teams identify and understand the various risks that could compromise the security of a system or application. There are several methods that can be used to create a comprehensive list of potential threats:

  1. Threat Categorization: One approach is to use threat categorization methods such as STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) or ASF (Accessibility, Security, Functionality) to systematically categorize and identify potential threats. These methods provide a structured framework for understanding the different types of threats that a system may face.
  2. Threat Trees: Another method is to construct threat trees, which are visual representations of how threats can be exposed through vulnerabilities. Threat trees help in analyzing the potential attack paths and consequences associated with each threat, allowing the security team to prioritize their efforts accordingly.
  3. Use and Misuse Cases: Use and misuse cases are scenarios that describe how legitimate users and potential attackers interact with a system. By considering various use and misuse cases, security teams can identify potential threats that may arise in different scenarios. This approach helps in validating the lack of countermeasures and determining whether the implemented security measures can adequately protect against the identified threats.

By utilizing threat categorization methods such as STRIDE or ASF, constructing threat trees, and considering use and misuse cases, security teams can create a comprehensive list of potential threats. This list forms the foundation for further analysis and risk mitigation efforts in the threat modeling process.

Stage 3: analyzing risks & vulnerabilities

In the third stage of threat modeling, the focus shifts towards analyzing the risks and vulnerabilities identified in the previous stages. This stage involves a detailed analysis of each potential threat to determine its likelihood and impact on the system. The security team evaluates the potential attackers, their motivations, and capabilities, in order to assess the level of risk associated with each threat. This analysis helps prioritize the identified threats based on their potential impact on the system and the valuable assets it houses.

Additionally, the security team examines the vulnerabilities within the system that could potentially be exploited by attackers. This involves assessing the weaknesses in the design, implementation, or configuration of the system that may leave it susceptible to attacks. By identifying these vulnerabilities and understanding how they can be exploited, the team can develop appropriate countermeasures to mitigate the potential risks. This stage also involves considering the potential impact of multiple threats and vulnerabilities combined, as attackers may employ a variety of attack vectors and techniques to achieve their goals.

Overall, stage 3 of threat modeling provides a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the risks and vulnerabilities inherent in the system. This analysis forms the foundation for developing robust security measures and countermeasures in subsequent stages to enhance the system's overall security posture.

Assessing likelihood of risk occurrence

Assessing the likelihood of risk occurrence is a crucial step in threat modeling that helps security teams prioritize potential threats and allocate resources effectively. Several factors can be considered when determining the likelihood of a risk during threat modeling:

  1. Type of Threat: Different types of threats have varying likelihoods of occurrence. For example, common threats like software vulnerabilities or phishing attacks may have a higher likelihood compared to more complex threats like advanced persistent threats.
  2. System Characteristics: The characteristics of the system being analyzed can influence the likelihood of risk occurrence. Factors such as the system's complexity, architecture, and security posture can increase or decrease the likelihood of successful attacks.
  3. Countermeasures: The implementation of effective countermeasures can reduce the likelihood of a risk occurring. Robust security measures, such as regular patching, strong access controls, and intrusion detection systems, can significantly decrease the likelihood of successful attacks.
  4. Ease of Exploitation: Assessing how easy it is for an attacker to exploit a vulnerability is crucial in determining the likelihood of a risk. Considerations such as the complexity of the vulnerability, the expertise required to exploit it, and the availability of tools and resources for attackers should be taken into account.
  5. Impact and Number of Components Affected: Considering the potential impact and the number of components affected by a threat helps in assessing its likelihood. Questions such as: 'Can the threat lead to the compromise of sensitive information?' or 'Will it disrupt critical infrastructure components or crash the system?' aid in evaluating the severity and likelihood of the risk.

By considering these factors, security teams can obtain a better understanding of the likelihood of risk occurrence during threat modeling and effectively prioritize mitigation efforts based on potential impact and resources available.

Useful References

General thought leadership and news

The buyers guide for MSPs and advisors considering 6clicks

The buyer’s guide for MSPs and advisors considering 6clicks

Selecting a cybersecurity, risk, and compliance platform like 6clicks involves a range of important considerations for managed service providers...

Regulatory changes and their impact on GRC

Regulatory changes and their impact on GRC

The ever-shifting regulatory landscape impels organizations to constantly recalibrate their GRC strategy according to all relevant laws and...

Growing together: our partnership philosophy

Growing together: our partnership philosophy

Our commitment to your success in the cybersecurity risk and compliance market is unwavering. At 6clicks, our motto, "GRC software that's smart, not...

Digital transformation for your MSP or advisory business

Digital transformation for your MSP or advisory business

This article follows our research and interviews with cyber, risk and compliance leaders. These industry leaders spread across Global Systems...

Cyber incident response: A critical component of enterprise security planning

Cyber incident response: A critical component of enterprise security planning

While beneficial, digital transformation has opened the door to various modern cyber threats. These threats are becoming increasingly sophisticated,...

6clicks on Azure Private Cloud for GRC managed services

6clicks on Azure Private Cloud for GRC managed services

Managed service providers play a critical role in helping organizations navigate complex regulatory landscapes and implement robust cyber GRC...