Skip to content

Ultimate Compliance Comparison

Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) versus SOC 2


Explore the differences between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and SOC 2. 

 

Never use spreadsheets again for compliance mapping


Explore and contrast Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and SOC 2

Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and SOC 2 are two different types of security frameworks that help organizations assess and manage their security risks. RFFR is a framework that uses a combination of risk management and security controls to identify, assess, and mitigate risk. SOC 2 is a framework that focuses on the security and availability of systems and data. Both frameworks help organizations ensure they are meeting their security requirements and provide guidance on how to protect their data and systems from potential threats. RFFR is more focused on risk management, while SOC 2 is more focused on system and data security.



What is Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)?

Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is an innovative risk management system designed to help organizations identify, assess, and manage risks. It is a comprehensive system that combines risk assessment, risk management, and risk communication tools to help organizations better understand and manage risk. It is designed to provide organizations with the ability to identify, evaluate, and manage risk in a timely and efficient manner. RFFR is a cloud-based system that can be accessed from any device, and it provides users with the ability to quickly and easily assess and manage risk. It also offers users the ability to create customized reports and dashboards for better visibility into risk management activities. RFFR also provides users with the ability to collaborate with other stakeholders and develop risk management plans. Additionally, RFFR provides users with the ability to track and monitor risk management activities over time.



What is SOC 2?

SOC 2 is an auditing procedure developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). It provides a framework for organizations to assess and report on their controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of their systems. SOC 2 is a widely adopted assurance framework used by organizations to demonstrate their compliance with applicable regulations and industry standards. The SOC 2 framework is designed to help organizations protect the security, availability, and privacy of their systems and data, as well as maintain the confidentiality of information entrusted to them. The SOC 2 report provides an independent assessment of an organizations controls and processes and helps organizations demonstrate their commitment to security and privacy.



A Comparison Between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and SOC 2

1. Both are standards for assessing and reporting on the security and privacy of an organization’s systems and processes.

2. Both emphasize the importance of implementing and maintaining effective security and privacy controls.

3. Both require organizations to document their security and privacy policies and procedures.

4. Both require organizations to conduct regular security and privacy audits.

5. Both require organizations to demonstrate that their security and privacy controls are effective and functioning as intended.

6. Both require organizations to have a process for responding to security and privacy incidents.



The Key Differences Between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and SOC 2

1. Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a risk assessment framework developed by Microsoft, while SOC 2 is an auditing standard created by the AICPA.

2. RFFR focuses on risk management and data protection, while SOC 2 focuses on security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

3. RFFR is tailored to the specific needs of an organization, while SOC 2 is a standardized audit.

4. RFFR is used to assess and prioritize risks, while SOC 2 is used to evaluate the effectiveness of an organization’s controls.

5. RFFR is a continuous process, while SOC 2 is a periodic audit.



Trusted by 1,000's of business worldwide

KWM
GKN automotive industry 6clicks
Volaris private equity using 6clicks
NSW government using 6clicks
Canva using 6clicks
NTT telecommunications using 6clicks
Flybuys using 6clicks for risk and compliance
CyberCX using 6clicks cybersecurity MSP
TCS advisor using 6clicks for GRC
Clydo & Co using 6clicks for legal services
G+T using 6clicks for risk and compliance
BDO using 6clicks for risk and compliance

6clicks lets you compare hundreds of standards, regulations and frameworks in seconds — no code required.

GET STARTED NOW

Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning


Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.
HubSpot Video

 

Hub & Spoke

'Push-down' standards to teams

'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.

Analytics

'Roll up' analytics for reporting

Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams. 

Our customers have spoken.

They genuinely love 6clicks.

"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."


David Simpson | CyberCX

"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”

Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed 

"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."

Head of Compliance | Fortune 500

Top 100 Innovators
customers-love-us-white
Capterra review badge
G2-Winter-Leader-ALL
RegTech Top 100
CRN Top 100
Michael Rasmussen | GRC 20/20 Research LLC

"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."

Michael Rasmussen
GRC 20/20 Research LLC

6clicks is powered by AI and includes all the content you need.
Our unique 6clicks Hub & Spoke architecture makes it simple to use and deploy.

logo
logo
logo
logo
logo
logo

GET STARTED TODAY