Ultimate Compliance Comparison
Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) versus APRA CPS 234
Explore the differences between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and APRA CPS 234.
Never use spreadsheets again for compliance mapping
Explore and contrast Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and APRA CPS 234
Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and APRA CPS 234 are both frameworks designed to help organizations manage their cyber risk. RFFR is a framework developed by the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC) to help organizations assess their cyber risk and develop an appropriate risk management strategy. APRA CPS 234 is a set of guidelines developed by the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) to help financial institutions manage their cyber risk. Both frameworks provide guidance on assessing and managing cyber risk, but RFFR is more focused on providing organizations with the tools to assess their own risk, while APRA CPS 234 is more prescriptive and provides specific guidance on how to manage cyber risk.
What is Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)?
Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a cloud-based risk management platform that enables companies to easily manage and monitor their risk exposures. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for users to identify, assess, and monitor risks across their business operations. RFFR helps organizations to identify the right risk management strategies and processes that are tailored to their specific needs. The platform provides an intuitive interface, allowing users to easily navigate through the various risk management features. Additionally, the platform provides an array of customizable reports and analytics to help users make informed decisions on how to best manage their risks. RFFR also provides users with access to a team of experienced risk management professionals who can provide guidance and advice on how to best manage their risks.
What is APRA CPS 234?
APRA CPS 234 is an Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) standard that sets out the cybersecurity requirements for all entities regulated by APRA. It outlines the risk management framework and minimum cybersecurity controls that must be implemented by entities in order to protect their information systems and data. The standard applies to all entities regulated by APRA, including banks, insurers, and superannuation funds. It requires entities to assess their cybersecurity risk, develop an appropriate risk management framework, and implement a set of minimum cybersecurity controls. The standard also requires entities to monitor their cybersecurity posture and respond to any identified threats or vulnerabilities. The aim of the standard is to ensure that entities are able to effectively protect their information systems and data from cyber threats and attacks.
A Comparison Between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and APRA CPS 234
1. Both standards require organizations to implement risk management processes to identify, assess, and manage risks.
2. Both standards require organizations to have a comprehensive risk management framework in place.
3. Both standards require organizations to develop and maintain risk management policies, procedures, and processes.
4. Both standards require organizations to conduct periodic risk assessments.
5. Both standards require organizations to develop risk management plans and strategies.
6. Both standards require organizations to monitor and report on risk management activities.
7. Both standards emphasize the importance of having an effective risk culture within the organization.
8. Both standards require organizations to have a clear understanding of their risk appetite and risk tolerance.
9. Both standards require organizations to have a comprehensive incident response and recovery plan.
10. Both standards emphasize the importance of having effective communication and collaboration between all stakeholders.
The Key Differences Between Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) and APRA CPS 234
1. RFFR is a risk management framework, while APRA CPS 234 is a cyber security standard.
2. RFFR focuses on the risk management process, while APRA CPS 234 focuses on the implementation of risk management controls.
3. RFFR is a generic framework and can be applied to any organization, while APRA CPS 234 is specific to the banking and financial services industry.
4. RFFR is based on an organizationâs risk appetite and tolerance, while APRA CPS 234 is based on a set of prescribed risk management controls.
5. RFFR is focused on the risk management process and governance, while APRA CPS 234 is focused on the implementation of technical controls.
Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning
Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.
'Push-down' standards to teams
'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.
'Roll up' analytics for reporting
Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams.
Our customers have spoken.
They genuinely love 6clicks.
"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."
David Simpson | CyberCX
"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”
Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed
"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."
Head of Compliance | Fortune 500
"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."
GRC 20/20 Research LLC