Ultimate Compliance Comparison
NIST SP 800-53 versus Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
Explore the differences between NIST SP 800-53 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR).
Never use spreadsheets again for compliance mapping
Explore and contrast NIST SP 800-53 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
NIST Special Publication 800-53 (SP 800-53) is the primary security control framework used by the U.S. government, while Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a more modern, agile approach to security control implementation. SP 800-53 provides a comprehensive set of security controls, but can be difficult to implement due to its complexity. RFFR is designed to be more user-friendly and cost-effective, allowing organizations to quickly identify and address their security needs. Both frameworks provide a solid foundation for security control implementation, but RFFR is more suited to organizations that need to quickly implement controls or have limited resources.
What is NIST SP 800-53?
NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-53, Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, is a publication from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that provides a catalog of security and privacy controls for federal agencies to use when creating, operating, and maintaining information systems. The publication is designed to help agencies meet their security and privacy requirements as outlined in the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA). The publication is organized into 18 control families and provides a detailed description of each control, its purpose, and its associated security and privacy requirements. It also provides guidance on how to implement the controls, as well as how to assess the effectiveness of the controls. SP 800-53 is intended to be used in conjunction with other NIST publications, such as SP 800-37 and SP 800-53A.
What is Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)?
Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a risk management tool designed to help organizations make more informed decisions about their risk management strategies. The tool provides a comprehensive assessment of an organizations risk landscape and identifies the most effective strategies to mitigate and manage risk. It also provides guidance on how to implement and monitor those strategies. RFFR is an online platform that is available to organizations of all sizes and across all industries. It is designed to help organizations analyze their current risk management practices, identify gaps and weaknesses, and develop an action plan to improve their risk management processes. Additionally, RFFR provides detailed reports and analytics to help organizations better understand their risk profile. With its comprehensive approach to risk management, RFFR is an invaluable tool for organizations looking to improve their risk management capabilities.
A Comparison Between NIST SP 800-53 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
1. Both frameworks provide guidance on security controls that can be used to protect an organizationâs information and systems.
2. Both frameworks focus on the importance of risk management and security posture.
3. Both frameworks emphasize the need for an organization to identify its assets, evaluate the risks associated with those assets, and develop appropriate security controls to protect them.
4. Both frameworks provide guidance on how to establish a security program and how to select and implement security controls.
5. Both frameworks emphasize the need for continuous monitoring, review, and improvement of the security posture.
6. Both frameworks provide a tiered approach to security controls and risk management, which allows organizations to tailor their security posture to their specific needs.
The Key Differences Between NIST SP 800-53 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
1. NIST SP 800-53 is a comprehensive set of security controls, while Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a risk-based approach to security control selection.
2. NIST SP 800-53 provides detailed guidance on security controls, while RFFR focuses on assessing the risk associated with an organizationâs environment and selecting the most appropriate security controls.
3. NIST SP 800-53 is a static approach, while RFFR is a dynamic approach that takes into account changes in the environment and the organizationâs risk profile.
4. NIST SP 800-53 is focused on compliance, while RFFR is focused on risk management.
5. NIST SP 800-53 is a government-mandated standard, while RFFR is a voluntary, industry-recognized approach.
Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning
Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.
'Push-down' standards to teams
'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.
'Roll up' analytics for reporting
Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams.
Our customers have spoken.
They genuinely love 6clicks.
"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."
David Simpson | CyberCX
"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”
Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed
"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."
Head of Compliance | Fortune 500
"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."
GRC 20/20 Research LLC