Ultimate Compliance Comparison
NIST SP 800-53 versus ASD IRAP
Explore the differences between NIST SP 800-53 and ASD IRAP.
Never use spreadsheets again for compliance mapping
Explore and contrast NIST SP 800-53 and ASD IRAP
NIST SP 800-53 and ASD IRAP are two security standards used to protect government and private sector IT systems. NIST SP 800-53 is used by the US government and provides guidelines for security management, risk assessment, and security control selection. ASD IRAP is the Australian Signals Directorate's Information Security Registered Assessors Program, which provides security assessments for government agencies and private sector organizations. Both standards provide guidance on security policy, risk assessment, and security controls, but ASD IRAP is more comprehensive, covering physical security, personnel security, and other areas.
What is NIST SP 800-53?
NIST SP 800-53 is a set of security and privacy controls developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to help organizations protect their information systems and data. The controls are organized into 18 families and are designed to be used in conjunction with the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) to help organizations assess and manage their security and privacy risks. The controls are divided into three categories: Basic, Hybrid, and Derived. Basic controls are the most basic security and privacy measures that organizations should implement to protect their systems and data. Hybrid controls are a combination of basic and derived controls, and derived controls are more specific and tailored to the organizationâs particular security and privacy needs. NIST SP 800-53 also provides guidance on how to implement the controls, as well as how to assess and document the security and privacy risks associated with the organizationâs systems and data.
What is ASD IRAP?
The ASD Information Security Registered Assessors Program (IRAP) is a program developed by the Australian Government to help ensure the security of information systems in Australia. The program is designed to assess the security of information systems against the Australian Government Information Security Manual and the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) Information Security Policy Framework. The program is managed by the ASD, and assesses the security of information systems to ensure they are compliant with the relevant security standards. The program consists of three parts: the assessment process, the assessment report and the assessment results. The assessment process includes a review of the system design, implementation and operation, as well as an assessment of the security controls in place. The assessment report is generated by the assessors and provides a detailed analysis of the systems security posture. Finally, the assessment results are used to inform decisions about the security of the system.
A Comparison Between NIST SP 800-53 and ASD IRAP
1. Both are risk management frameworks that provide guidance on how to protect organizational assets and data.
2. Both provide guidance on the implementation of security controls and best practices.
3. Both have a comprehensive list of security controls that should be implemented to ensure the security of an organizationâs information systems.
4. Both provide guidance on the development of security policies and procedures.
5. Both emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and assessment of security controls.
6. Both emphasize the importance of regular risk assessments.
7. Both provide guidance on the development of incident response plans.
The Key Differences Between NIST SP 800-53 and ASD IRAP
1. NIST SP 800-53 is a set of security requirements for US federal agencies, while ASD IRAP is a set of security requirements for Australian government entities.
2. NIST SP 800-53 focuses on the security of information systems, while ASD IRAP focuses on the security of the entire organization.
3. NIST SP 800-53 defines security controls in terms of the Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (CIA) triad, while ASD IRAP defines security controls in terms of the Risk Management Framework (RMF).
4. NIST SP 800-53 requires organizations to establish a formal security program and implement security controls, while ASD IRAP requires organizations to assess their security posture and develop an Information Security Plan (ISP).
5. NIST SP 800-53 is focused on protecting information systems and data, while ASD IRAP is focused on protecting the entire organization.
Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning
Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.
'Push-down' standards to teams
'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.
'Roll up' analytics for reporting
Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams.
Our customers have spoken.
They genuinely love 6clicks.
"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."
David Simpson | CyberCX
"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”
Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed
"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."
Head of Compliance | Fortune 500
"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."
GRC 20/20 Research LLC