Explore and contrast ASD Essential 8 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
ASD Essential 8 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) are two frameworks for managing cyber security risks. ASD Essential 8 focuses on eight key areas of cyber security, such as patching, application whitelisting, and user access control, while RFFR takes a more holistic approach, looking at the entire risk management process, from risk identification to implementation of controls. Both frameworks provide guidance on how to identify and mitigate cyber security risks, but RFFR is more comprehensive and covers a wider range of topics.
Contents
What is ASD Essential 8?
The ASD Essential 8 is a set of eight security strategies developed by the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) to help organizations reduce the risk of cyber security attacks. The Essential 8 is designed to be implemented in a layered approach, with each strategy building on the others to provide a comprehensive cyber security solution. The eight strategies are: application whitelisting, patching applications, patching operating systems, restricting administrative privileges, user application hardening, multi-factor authentication, daily backups, and email protection. Each strategy is designed to reduce the risk of cyber security attacks, while also helping organizations to maintain system performance and reliability. Implementing the Essential 8 can help organizations to reduce the risk of data loss, system downtime, and other cyber security threats.
What is Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)?
Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) is a risk management software platform designed to help organizations identify, assess, and manage risk. It is designed to help organizations of all sizes and industries identify and manage risks related to their operations, products, services, and projects. The platform provides a comprehensive set of tools to help organizations identify, assess, and manage risks. It also provides a range of reporting and analytics to help organizations better understand their risk profile and take proactive steps to mitigate risk. RFFR also includes a library of risk management best practices and resources to help organizations stay up to date with the latest industry trends and regulations.
A Comparison Between ASD Essential 8 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
1. Both ASD Essential 8 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR) emphasize the importance of cyber security and the need to create a culture of security awareness and understanding within organizations.
2. Both emphasize the need for organizations to have a risk management framework in place to identify, assess, and manage risks.
3. Both emphasize the need for organizations to develop a security strategy, plan, and architecture to protect their data and systems.
4. Both emphasize the need for organizations to implement measures to protect data and systems, including encryption, authentication, access control, and user education.
5. Both emphasize the need for organizations to regularly review and update their security measures to ensure they remain effective.
6. Both emphasize the need for organizations to monitor their systems and respond to any security incidents.
7. Both emphasize the need for organizations to have a robust incident response plan in place to quickly and effectively respond to any security incidents.
8. Both emphasize the need for organizations to regularly test their security measures and respond to any vulnerabilities identified.
The Key Differences Between ASD Essential 8 and Right Fit For Risk (RFFR)
1. ASD Essential 8 focuses on the prevention of cyber security incidents, while RFFR is a tool for assessing the risk associated with cyber security incidents.
2. ASD Essential 8 outlines a set of security strategies and controls, while RFFR is a framework for assessing the risk associated with those strategies and controls.
3. ASD Essential 8 is focused on the implementation of security controls, while RFFR is focused on the measurement of risk associated with those security controls.
4. ASD Essential 8 is designed to provide a baseline of security measures, while RFFR is designed to provide a tailored approach to risk management.
5. ASD Essential 8 is an Australian Government initiative, while RFFR is an industry-led initiative.
Hear from world-renowned GRC analyst Michael Rasmussen about 6clicks and why it's breakthrough approach is winning
Get up and running with 6clicks in just a matter of hours.

'Push-down' standards to teams
'Push' your standard templates, controls, and risk libraries to your teams.

'Roll up' analytics for reporting
Roll-up analytics for consolidated reporting across your teams.
Our customers have spoken.
They genuinely love 6clicks.
"The best cyber GRC platform for businesses and advisors."
David Simpson | CyberCX
"We chose 6clicks not only for our clients, but also our internal use”
Chief Risk Officer | Publically Listed
"We use Hub & Spoke globally for our cyber compliance program. Love it."
Head of Compliance | Fortune 500






"The 6clicks solution simplifies and strengthens risk, compliance, and control processes across entities and can grow and adapt as the organization changes and evolves."
Michael Rasmussen
GRC 20/20 Research LLC
6clicks is powered by AI and includes all the content you need.
Our unique 6clicks Hub & Spoke architecture makes it simple to use and deploy.
.png)

.png)

.png)
.png)