Skip to content

What is difference between ESG and CSR?

Explore some of our latest AI related thought leadership and research

6clicks has been built for cyber risk and compliance professionals to automate and streamline security compliance, IT risk management, vendor risk management, incident management, and more.

Learn more about our Hub & Spoke architecture, Hailey AI engine and explore the other content in our platform here

Risk, threat and vulnerability - what's the difference?

Risk, threat and vulnerability - what's the difference?

What is the difference between NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF?

What is the difference between NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF?

The top 5 vendor risk assessment questionnaires for 2023

The top 5 vendor risk assessment questionnaires for 2023

What is a risk register and how to automate

What is a risk register and why is it important?

Top management's key responsibilities for ISO 27001 implementation

Top management's key responsibilities for ISO 27001 implementation

The founder’s story: How 6clicks was born and what’s behind the name

The founder’s story: How 6clicks was born and what’s behind the name


Definition of ESG and CSR

As companies strive to become more socially and environmentally responsible, two key concepts have emerged - ESG and CSR. While they both aim to drive positive change and influence company behavior, there are distinct differences between the two. Understanding these differences is crucial for companies looking to align their practices with sustainable and responsible principles.

Definition of ESG:

ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance, and it represents a holistic approach to measuring the impact of a company's operations on society and the environment. ESG factors encompass a wide range of criteria that include a company's carbon emissions, waste management, labor practices, diversity and inclusion, and board composition, among others. ESG factors are used to evaluate a company's sustainability performance and determine its overall societal and environmental impact.

Definition of CSR:

CSR, which stands for Corporate Social Responsibility, is a concept that focuses on a company's voluntary efforts to positively impact society and the environment. CSR activities often include philanthropy, community involvement, charitable giving, employee volunteering, and initiatives to reduce environmental footprint. CSR initiatives are typically seen as discretionary activities that go beyond legal requirements and are driven by a company's desire to be seen as socially responsible and contribute to a sustainable future.

Difference between ESG and CSR

ESG and CSR are two important concepts in the realm of corporate sustainability. While they share a common goal of promoting sustainable practices, there are key differences between the two.

ESG, or Environmental, Social, and Governance, is an investor-approved framework that quantifiably measures a company's sustainability performance. It enables investors to assess the impact of a company's operations on the environment and society, as well as evaluate its governance practices. ESG factors cover a wide range of criteria, including carbon emissions, waste management, labor practices, diversity and inclusion, and board composition. ESG provides a standardized assessment that allows investors to compare companies and make informed investment decisions based on their sustainability performance.

On the other hand, CSR, or Corporate Social Responsibility, is a comprehensive sustainability framework widely adopted by businesses. It focuses on a company's voluntary efforts to positively impact society and the environment. CSR encompasses various initiatives such as philanthropy, community involvement, charitable giving, employee volunteering, and measures to reduce environmental footprint. Unlike ESG, CSR is typically used as an internal tool for companies to assess their sustainability and improve their social and environmental practices.

In recent years, there has been a shift towards the prominence of ESG as a more robust and quantifiable measure of sustainable practices. Investors are increasingly considering ESG factors when making investment decisions, as it provides them with a clear assessment of a company's sustainability performance. As a result, ESG has overshadowed CSR in terms of measuring and evaluating sustainable practices. However, CSR still plays a crucial role in guiding companies towards responsible corporate behavior and contributing to a sustainable future.

History of ESG and CSR

Over the years, businesses have recognized the need to address their impact on society and the environment. This led to the development of frameworks and concepts like Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). ESG emerged as an investor-driven framework, focusing on measuring a company's sustainability performance through quantifiable criteria. On the other hand, CSR has been widely adopted by businesses as a comprehensive sustainability framework, emphasizing voluntary efforts to have a positive impact on society and the environment. Understanding the history and distinctions between ESG and CSR helps businesses and investors navigate the evolving landscape of sustainability and corporate responsibility.

Origin of ESG

ESG, which stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance, is a framework that measures a company's sustainability performance and its impact on society and the environment. It emerged as a response to the increasing need for companies to be accountable and transparent in their corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts.

The origin of ESG can be traced back to the early 2000s, when the concept of CSR began gaining traction. Companies were starting to recognize the importance of addressing social and environmental issues and their impact on their reputation, customer loyalty, and financial performance. However, there was a lack of standardized metrics and frameworks to assess and compare companies' CSR efforts.

A key milestone in the popularization of ESG was the launch of the UN Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) in 2006. These principles provided a framework for investors to incorporate ESG factors into their investment decision-making process. This brought attention to the importance of ESG as a means to evaluate a company's long-term sustainability and its ability to manage social and environmental risks.

The goal of ESG is to bridge the CSR data gap by capturing and assessing a company's sustainability performance through measurable goals and frameworks. It goes beyond just financial performance to consider the impact a company has on the environment, its employees, and the society at large. ESG factors include issues such as climate change, labor practices, corporate governance, community engagement, and diversity.

Origin of CSR

The origin of corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be traced back to the mid-20th century when the concept began gaining recognition. Business scholar Howard Bowen played a pivotal role in popularizing CSR with his book, "Social Responsibilities of the Businessman," published in 1953. Bowen argued that businesses have a responsibility to consider the impact of their actions on society beyond profit-making.

Another influential development in the origin of CSR was the Committee for Economic Development (CED), formed in 1942. The CED advocated for businesses to assume a broader societal role and promoted the idea that businesses should address social issues, such as civil rights and education. They highlighted the importance of businesses aligning their strategies with societal needs.

Over time, the concept of CSR has evolved. In the 2000s, companies began realizing that CSR initiatives can enhance their reputation, deepen customer loyalty, and positively impact financial performance. As a result, CSR practices expanded to include sustainability efforts, environmental responsibility, fair treatment of employees, and strong corporate governance.

Today, CSR is widely recognized as a key element of a company's overall corporate strategy. It involves taking into account the interests of various stakeholders, including employees, communities, customers, and the environment. The evolution of CSR reflects a growing understanding of the importance of businesses' role in addressing societal challenges and working towards a sustainable and ethical future.

Development of ESG

ESG, which stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance, is an approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR) that has gained significant importance and popularity in recent years.

The development of ESG can be traced back to the early 21st century, when companies started recognizing the need to go beyond traditional CSR practices and incorporate a comprehensive framework that considers their impact on the environment, society, and governance aspects. This shift was largely driven by global concerns about climate change, social inequality, and ethical business practices.

Milestones in the development of ESG include the publication of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines in 2002, which provided a framework for companies to report their sustainability performance. This was followed by the introduction of the United Nations Global Compact in 2004, which encouraged companies to adopt sustainable and socially responsible policies.

The 2008 financial crisis further fueled the demand for ESG practices, as investors and stakeholders sought greater transparency and accountability from companies. This led to the emergence of ESG ratings agencies and indices, such as the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and MSCI ESG Ratings, which assess companies based on their ESG performance.

Today, the growth of ESG is driven by various factors, including increased investor awareness and demand for responsible investments, regulatory requirements, and the recognition that sustainable practices can contribute to long-term financial performance.

Development of CSR

The development of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has evolved over time, reflecting shifting attitudes, operationalization efforts, and globalized approaches.

In the mid-20th century, CSR was primarily driven by an ideology that focused on the social obligations of businesses. This ideology viewed businesses as responsible for addressing social issues and contributing to the welfare of society. However, the operationalization of CSR began in the 1980s, as companies recognized the need to integrate social and environmental concerns into their core business practices. This shift was influenced by a growing recognition of the potential risks and benefits associated with corporate behavior.

Key concepts and events have shaped the development of CSR. Carroll's Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility, introduced in 1979, outlined the four responsibilities of businesses: economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic. This framework provided a foundation for understanding CSR and its varying levels of commitments.

The European Commission also played a significant role in promoting CSR, encouraging businesses to adopt responsible practices through policy initiatives and support. This further accelerated the globalized nature of CSR, as companies across different countries began prioritizing social and environmental considerations.

Additionally, the introduction of creating shared value (CSV) by Michael Porter and Mark Kramer, and the emergence of sustainability as a guiding principle, have influenced CSR practices. CSV recognizes that businesses can create economic value while simultaneously addressing societal needs. Sustainability emphasizes the integration of environmental, social, and economic dimensions for long-term success.

Relationship between ESG and CSR

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) are two closely related concepts that focus on the responsibility of businesses towards society and the environment. While CSR has been around for decades and primarily emphasizes companies' voluntary actions to contribute to social and environmental issues, ESG is a more recent framework that encompasses a broader range of factors. ESG factors go beyond just social responsibility and include environmental and governance aspects as well. ESG considers how a company's operations impact the environment, how it treats employees and stakeholders, and how it adheres to ethical and governance practices. CSR, on the other hand, typically refers to a company's initiatives and practices that have a positive impact on society and the environment. In other words, ESG is a more comprehensive framework that incorporates CSR as a subset. Both ESG and CSR aim to encourage companies to take responsibility for their actions and promote sustainable and ethical practices in their operations.

Impact on people, planet, and profit

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) initiatives both have the potential to make a positive impact on people, planet, and profit.

ESG initiatives focus on integrating environmental, social, and governance factors into corporate decision-making processes. By addressing environmental concerns, such as reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainability, companies can contribute to a healthier planet. Socially responsible actions, such as fair treatment of employees and supporting local communities, contribute to a positive impact on society. Strong corporate governance ensures ethical practices and accountability, leading to improved financial performance and reduced risks.

Similarly, CSR initiatives aim to address social and environmental issues while considering financial performance. Companies set measurable goals to ensure their initiatives create a positive impact on society. By proactively addressing social issues and fostering a sustainable business culture, companies can drive customer loyalty and attract socially conscious stakeholders. CSR efforts also help companies reduce their carbon footprint, minimize environmental harm, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Implementing ESG and CSR practices can bring numerous benefits, including a positive brand image, increased employee morale, and enhanced relationships with key stakeholders. It can also attract socially responsible investors and lower the risk of legal and reputational issues. However, challenges may arise due to the need for significant financial investments, the complexity of implementing sustainable practices, and the possible conflict between short-term financial goals and long-term sustainability goals.

Synergistic benefits to companies

Implementing both ESG and CSR initiatives can bring synergistic benefits to companies, enhancing their sustainability efforts and overall performance. By integrating environmental, social, and governance factors into their decision-making processes, companies can address a wide range of issues and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Through ESG initiatives, companies focus on minimizing their environmental footprint, reducing carbon emissions, and promoting sustainability. CSR initiatives, on the other hand, aim to address social issues and foster a sustainable business culture. When these two programs work together, companies can achieve a higher level of impact on people, the planet, and profit.

By combining ESG and CSR, companies can create a comprehensive sustainability strategy that benefits both society and the bottom line. The integration of environmental and social considerations leads to improved corporate governance and ethical practices. This, in turn, reduces risks, enhances the company's reputation, and attracts socially conscious stakeholders.

Furthermore, the adoption of ESG and CSR practices can lead to increased employee morale and stronger relationships with key stakeholders. By committing to sustainable practices and social responsibility, companies can improve their brand image and drive customer loyalty. This can ultimately contribute to long-term profitability and success.

Interrelated goals for corporate sustainability

Corporate sustainability encompasses a set of interrelated goals that businesses strive to achieve, which are centered around balancing economic, social, and environmental impacts. This approach, also known as the triple bottom line, considers not just financial profits but also the well-being of people and the planet.

Economically, businesses aim to succeed and generate profits, but they also recognize the importance of sustainable practices. By implementing strategies that minimize waste, reduce resource consumption, and promote efficiency, companies can not only save costs in the long run but also contribute to the preservation of natural resources for future generations.

Socially, businesses understand the significance of their impact on their employees, customers, communities, and society as a whole. They strive to create a positive workplace culture, fair treatment of employees, and contribute to community development initiatives. By fostering social responsibility and addressing social issues, businesses can build stronger relationships with stakeholders and enhance their reputation.

Environmentally, companies recognize their responsibility to minimize negative impacts on the environment. This includes reducing carbon emissions, conserving energy and water, adopting renewable energy sources, and implementing sustainable waste management practices. By prioritizing environmental sustainability, businesses can contribute to the preservation of ecosystems, mitigate climate change, and promote a sustainable future for all.

Common principles shared by both programs

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) are two frameworks that share common principles focused on social responsibility, environmental impact, and governance. Both programs aim to create a positive impact on society and promote sustainable business practices.

In terms of social responsibility, both ESG and CSR initiatives strive to address social issues and contribute to the well-being of communities. This includes fair treatment of employees, community development initiatives, and fostering a positive workplace culture. By prioritizing social responsibility, both programs aim to build stronger relationships with stakeholders and enhance their reputation.

Regarding environmental impact, both ESG and CSR initiatives recognize the need to minimize negative effects on the environment. This involves reducing carbon emissions, conserving energy and water, adopting renewable energy sources, and implementing sustainable waste management practices. By prioritizing environmental sustainability, both programs contribute to the preservation of ecosystems, mitigate climate change, and promote a sustainable future.

Lastly, in terms of governance, both ESG and CSR emphasize accountability, transparency, and stakeholder engagement. This includes considering the interests of key stakeholders, implementing fair and ethical practices, and integrating responsible governance processes. By adhering to strong governance principles, companies under both frameworks can ensure ethical behavior, maintain long-term sustainability, and create value for society.

Scope and range of both initiatives

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) initiatives both play a vital role in demonstrating a company's commitment to sustainable business practices. While they share common objectives, there are key differences in their scope and range.

CSR initiatives primarily focus on the social impact a company has on society and its stakeholders. This includes efforts to address social issues, promote positive community development, and ensure fair treatment of employees. CSR initiatives are often seen as a precursor to ESG, with companies implementing self-regulation and committing to sustainable practices that can later be refined and integrated into ESG metrics.

ESG initiatives, on the other hand, encompass a broader scope by integrating environmental, social, and governance factors into core corporate strategy. In addition to addressing social issues, ESG initiatives prioritize environmental sustainability and strong governance principles. This involves reducing carbon emissions, adopting sustainable practices, and implementing transparent and accountable governance processes.

The key difference between ESG and CSR lies in their breadth and depth. While CSR focuses primarily on social responsibility, ESG goes further by incorporating environmental and governance aspects into the core business strategy. ESG initiatives provide a more comprehensive framework for companies to identify, measure, and report on their sustainability performance, allowing for a holistic approach to sustainable business practices.

Difference in implementation strategies

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) differ not only in their focus areas but also in their implementation strategies. ESG initiatives prioritize quantifiable performance metrics, setting measurable goals, and conducting audits to ensure compliance. This approach allows companies to track their progress, identify areas for improvement, and demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and responsible business practices.

In contrast, CSR is a more self-regulating initiative that focuses on creating a positive brand image and boosting corporate reputation. It often involves implementing voluntary practices and initiatives that align with the company's values and contribute to social and community development. While CSR may include some measurable goals, its emphasis is more on corporate behavior and the positive impact a company can have on society and stakeholders.

The key difference lies in how these approaches are implemented and their respective goals. ESG initiatives provide a structured and enforceable sustainability framework for companies to follow, ensuring that environmental, social, and governance factors are integrated into the core business strategy. On the other hand, CSR is more flexible and relies on the company's own self-regulation and commitment to socially responsible practices.

ESG's focus on quantifiable metrics and measurable goals helps companies drive sustainable practices and ensure accountability. It allows for benchmarking, reporting, and comparison of performance, making it easier to identify areas that need improvement. In contrast, CSR primarily aims to create a positive brand image and enhance corporate reputation through initiatives aligned with social values.

Key differences between ESG and CSR

ESG and CSR are both approaches that businesses can adopt to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and social responsibility. However, there are key differences between the two that distinguish their focus and implementation.

ESG, or Environmental, Social, and Governance, is a structured initiative that emphasizes specific goals with quantifiable results. It requires companies to integrate sustainability principles into their core business strategy and operations. ESG strategies demonstrate a company's actual activities and successes in areas such as reducing carbon emissions, promoting diversity and inclusion, and implementing strong governance practices. It involves benchmarking, reporting, and comparison of performance, which allows companies to identify areas that need improvement and track progress over time.

On the other hand, CSR, or Corporate Social Responsibility, is a broader philosophy of accountability and socially responsible behavior. It is more flexible and focuses on evolving processes within each corporation, industry, and society. While CSR also aims to create a positive brand image and enhance corporate reputation, its emphasis is on corporate behavior and the positive impact a company can have on society and stakeholders. CSR often includes voluntary practices and initiatives aligned with the company's values and contributing to social and community development.

Understanding the differences between ESG and CSR is essential, especially as businesses transition from CSR to more focused and measurable ESG strategies. Companies need to recognize that ESG goes beyond mere reputation management and instead requires tangible actions and results. By embracing the specific goals and quantifiable results of ESG, businesses can drive sustainable practices, ensure accountability, and contribute to a more socially conscious and responsible future.

Useful References

General thought leadership and news

The buyers guide for MSPs and advisors considering 6clicks

The buyer’s guide for MSPs and advisors considering 6clicks

Selecting a cybersecurity, risk, and compliance platform like 6clicks involves a range of important considerations for managed service providers...

Regulatory changes and their impact on GRC

Regulatory changes and their impact on GRC

The ever-shifting regulatory landscape impels organizations to constantly recalibrate their GRC strategy according to all relevant laws and...

Growing together: our partnership philosophy

Growing together: our partnership philosophy

Our commitment to your success in the cybersecurity risk and compliance market is unwavering. At 6clicks, our motto, "GRC software that's smart, not...

Digital transformation for your MSP or advisory business

Digital transformation for your MSP or advisory business

This article follows our research and interviews with cyber, risk and compliance leaders. These industry leaders spread across Global Systems...

Cyber incident response: A critical component of enterprise security planning

Cyber incident response: A critical component of enterprise security planning

While beneficial, digital transformation has opened the door to various modern cyber threats. These threats are becoming increasingly sophisticated,...

6clicks on Azure Private Cloud for GRC managed services

6clicks on Azure Private Cloud for GRC managed services

Managed service providers play a critical role in helping organizations navigate complex regulatory landscapes and implement robust cyber GRC...